Abstrakt
The accounting and budgetary documentation of the General Government (GG) for the year 1940 appears, at first glance, to be a product of bureaucratic routine—a collection of tables and sections designed for rational administrative management. A close examination of historical sources reveals its function as an active instrument of the occupation administration. Seemingly neutral accounting categories operated as precise tools for managing, legitimizing, and concealing the systemic plunder of material and human resources. The central research problem of this analysis is: In what ways did the budgetary and accounting documentation of the GG reflect and legitimize the mechanisms of forced redistribution and allocation of resources to the occupation apparatus? The thesis assumes that an examination of the GG budget, its structure, and its off-plan expenditures exposes the bureaucratic logic underpinning systemic exploitation and the financing of the apparatus of repression. The neutral language of accounting effectively masked the true nature of violent asset transfers, while financial reporting functioned as a technology of power that bestowed an appearance of legality on practices of plunder. The analysis is based on historical documentation. The study employs a case study approach, analysis of historical sources, and a review of the relevant literature.
Bibliografia
• Antonelli, V., Bigoni, M., Funnell, W., Cafaro, E., Gagliardo, E.: Popular culture and totalitarianism: Accounting for propaganda in Italy under the Fascist regime (1934–1945), Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 96, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102524
• Archiwum Akt Nowych w Warszawie (AAN), Höherer SS- und Polizeiführer. Rechnungslegung und Rechnungsprüfung. Bd I, H 1. Sprawozdanie rachunkowo-budżetowe Wyższego Dowódcy SS i Policji za 1940 r., sygn. 5341471
• Bräu, R.: The Economic Consequences of German Occupation Policy in Poland w :Paying for Hitler's War red. Scherner, White, Cambridge University Press, 2016, p. 427
• Chwastiak, Michele & Lehman, Glen, 2008. "Accounting for war," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), p. 313-326.
• Cobbin, P., Burrows, G.: The profession of arms and the profession of accounting numbers – Accounting, the military and war: A review. Accounting History Volume 23, Issue 4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373218779188
• Crowe, D.: The German Plunder and Theft of Jewish Property in the General Government, w: NaziLaw: From Nuremberg to Nuremberg, edited by John J. Michalczyk, 157-168. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
• Funnel, W.:ACCOUNTING IN THE SERVICE OF THE HOLOCAUST, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Volume 9, Issue 4, 1998, p. 435-464, https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1997.0164
• Komar, Ż.: Architecture in German-Occupied Kraków Selected Research Problems, in:kunsttexte.de/ostblick, No. 3, 2019 (11 Seiten),www.kunsttexte.de/ostblick.
• Lehenczuk, S.: Historical Aspects of the Development of Accounting System in the Context of Hostilities, EEM, 2019, Tom 6, Numer 2, p. 47 – 55, https://doi.org/10.23939/eem2019.02.047
• Lippman, E., Wilson, P.: The culpability of accounting in perpetuating the Holocaust, Accounting History Volume 12, Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373207079028
• Mennicken, A., Miller, P.: Accounting, Territorialization and Power, Foucault Studies, No. 13, pp. 4-24, 2012
• Mielnik, H.: Nazistowski kolonializm prawny. (Nie)porządek prawny Generalnego Gubernatorstwa (1939–1945)*, Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 44, nr 3, 2022 , p. 101-132
• Overy, R. (1994). War and Economy in the Third Reich. Clarendon Press.
• Purchla, J.: The Architecture of the Third Reich in Cracow – a Dissonant Heritage?, RIHA Journal 0253, 2020 [View of 0253 The Architecture of the Third Reich in Cracow – a Dissonant Heritage? | RIHA Journal]

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Korneliusz Ślaź, Maja Jaworska
